<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHO IS THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST UNDER FRCP RULE 17 &#8211; HWANG CASE &#8211; CALIFORNIA BANKRUPTCY MOTION TO LIFT THE AUTOMATIC STAY IN CHAPTER 7 BK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/who-is-the-real-party-in-interest-under-frcp-rule-17-hwang-case-california-bankruptcy-motion-to-lift-the-automatic-stay-in-chapter-7-bk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/who-is-the-real-party-in-interest-under-frcp-rule-17-hwang-case-california-bankruptcy-motion-to-lift-the-automatic-stay-in-chapter-7-bk/</link>
	<description>Make Your Lender Produce The Note.  Predatory Lending, Foreclosure Defense &#38; Mortgage Litigation.  The Law Offices of Steven C. Vondran.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:35:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: In re Hwang &#8211; who is the real party in interest that can lift the automatic stay in Bankruptcy Court? One California case sheds light! : UltimateBK.com</title>
		<link>http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/who-is-the-real-party-in-interest-under-frcp-rule-17-hwang-case-california-bankruptcy-motion-to-lift-the-automatic-stay-in-chapter-7-bk/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>In re Hwang &#8211; who is the real party in interest that can lift the automatic stay in Bankruptcy Court? One California case sheds light! : UltimateBK.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 03:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/?p=207#comment-95</guid>
		<description>[...] they were a real party in interest under Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  SEEhttp://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/who-is-the-real-party-in-interest-under-frcp-rule-17-h....  THE COURT WENT ON TO STATE THAT “IF A LOAN HAS BEEN SECURITIZED, THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST IS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they were a real party in interest under Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  SEEhttp://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/who-is-the-real-party-in-interest-under-frcp-rule-17-h&#8230;.  THE COURT WENT ON TO STATE THAT “IF A LOAN HAS BEEN SECURITIZED, THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST IS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can you challenge the motion to lift the automatic stay? Understanding legal Standing and Real Party in Interest in California bankruptcy Chapter 7 :: Bankruptcy Attorneys</title>
		<link>http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/who-is-the-real-party-in-interest-under-frcp-rule-17-hwang-case-california-bankruptcy-motion-to-lift-the-automatic-stay-in-chapter-7-bk/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Can you challenge the motion to lift the automatic stay? Understanding legal Standing and Real Party in Interest in California bankruptcy Chapter 7 :: Bankruptcy Attorneys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 02:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/?p=207#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...] they were a real party in interest under Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  SEE http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/who-is-the-real-party-in-interest-under-frcp-rule-17-h....  THE COURT WENT ON TO STATE THAT “IF A LOAN HAS BEEN SECURITIZED, THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST IS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they were a real party in interest under Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  SEE http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/who-is-the-real-party-in-interest-under-frcp-rule-17-h&#8230;.  THE COURT WENT ON TO STATE THAT “IF A LOAN HAS BEEN SECURITIZED, THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST IS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

