<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In re Hwang &#8211; An overview of motion for relief from automatic stay, real party in interest, and constitutional standing requirements in a California bankruptcy court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/in-re-hwang-an-overview-of-motion-for-relief-from-automatic-stay-real-party-in-interest-and-constitutional-standing-requirements-in-a-california-bankruptcy-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/in-re-hwang-an-overview-of-motion-for-relief-from-automatic-stay-real-party-in-interest-and-constitutional-standing-requirements-in-a-california-bankruptcy-court/</link>
	<description>Make Your Lender Produce The Note.  Predatory Lending, Foreclosure Defense &#38; Mortgage Litigation.  The Law Offices of Steven C. Vondran.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:35:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Who is the real party in interest that can lift the automatic stay in Bankruptcy Court? One California case sheds light! : UltimateBK.com</title>
		<link>http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/in-re-hwang-an-overview-of-motion-for-relief-from-automatic-stay-real-party-in-interest-and-constitutional-standing-requirements-in-a-california-bankruptcy-court/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Who is the real party in interest that can lift the automatic stay in Bankruptcy Court? One California case sheds light! : UltimateBK.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 03:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/?p=211#comment-93</guid>
		<description>[...] California BK Case (Real Party in Interest): In re Hwang, 396 B.R. 757 (C.D. California 2008). LINK:  Here is a link to the Case Analysis: http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/in-re-hwang-an-overview-of-motion-for-relief-from-auto... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] California BK Case (Real Party in Interest): In re Hwang, 396 B.R. 757 (C.D. California 2008). LINK:  Here is a link to the Case Analysis: http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/in-re-hwang-an-overview-of-motion-for-relief-from-auto&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can a lender or their agent (ex, the loan servicer) pursue a non-judicial foreclose on real property via exercising the power of sale contained in the deed of trust, if the alleged creditor has only the note and no assignment and recording of the deed of </title>
		<link>http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/in-re-hwang-an-overview-of-motion-for-relief-from-automatic-stay-real-party-in-interest-and-constitutional-standing-requirements-in-a-california-bankruptcy-court/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Can a lender or their agent (ex, the loan servicer) pursue a non-judicial foreclose on real property via exercising the power of sale contained in the deed of trust, if the alleged creditor has only the note and no assignment and recording of the deed of </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 03:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/?p=211#comment-92</guid>
		<description>[...] These cases seem to give the lenders wide latitude to just merely claim they own the note (they never want to show it) and have the Court agree that the security naturally follows (whether or not the deed of trust was assigned, acknowledged, and recorded) and that the lender therefore has standing to lift a stay in bankruptcy court.  If the lender can show proof of the original promissory note in the BK lift-stay motion, I would say I might agree.  But again, they will not want to show the note, and it is up to the BK judge to demand they show this critical piece of evidence before they allow a creditor to lift the automatic stay.  If you want legal authority take a look at In re Hwang, 396 B.R. 757 (C.D. California 2008.  I have attached a link to my case brief on this important case: http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/in-re-hwang-an-overview-of-motion-for-relief-from-auto... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] These cases seem to give the lenders wide latitude to just merely claim they own the note (they never want to show it) and have the Court agree that the security naturally follows (whether or not the deed of trust was assigned, acknowledged, and recorded) and that the lender therefore has standing to lift a stay in bankruptcy court.  If the lender can show proof of the original promissory note in the BK lift-stay motion, I would say I might agree.  But again, they will not want to show the note, and it is up to the BK judge to demand they show this critical piece of evidence before they allow a creditor to lift the automatic stay.  If you want legal authority take a look at In re Hwang, 396 B.R. 757 (C.D. California 2008.  I have attached a link to my case brief on this important case: <a href="http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/in-re-hwang-an-overview-of-motion-for-relief-from-auto.." rel="nofollow">http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/in-re-hwang-an-overview-of-motion-for-relief-from-auto..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can you challenge the motion to lift the automatic stay? Understanding legal Standing and Real Party in Interest in California bankruptcy Chapter 7 :: Bankruptcy Attorneys</title>
		<link>http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/in-re-hwang-an-overview-of-motion-for-relief-from-automatic-stay-real-party-in-interest-and-constitutional-standing-requirements-in-a-california-bankruptcy-court/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Can you challenge the motion to lift the automatic stay? Understanding legal Standing and Real Party in Interest in California bankruptcy Chapter 7 :: Bankruptcy Attorneys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 02:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/?p=211#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] California BK Case (Real Party in Interest): In re Hwang, 396 B.R. 757 (C.D. California 2008). LINK:  Here is a link to the Case Analysis: http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/in-re-hwang-an-overview-of-motion-for-relief-from-auto... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] California BK Case (Real Party in Interest): In re Hwang, 396 B.R. 757 (C.D. California 2008). LINK:  Here is a link to the Case Analysis: http://www.producethenoteattorney.com/2010/05/in-re-hwang-an-overview-of-motion-for-relief-from-auto&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

